February 14, 2017 – Bains LawFirm
The
decision to relocate can have an immense impact on the children and the other
parent’s time with them. A prior post
discussed the process of Notice and Objection in relocation cases. This post discusses the basis for the court
to determine a relocation matter once an objection has been timely filed.
There is a presumption that a relocating primary residential
parent will be permitted to relocate the children unless the objecting parent
can present evidence that outweighs this presumption. The objecting parent must
demonstrate the detrimental effect of the relocation overcomes the benefit of
the change to the child and the relocating person, based on eleven statutory factors (RCW
26.09.520). Courts have been consistent to set forth that
the factors are not weighted and that no inference should be drawn from the
order in which they are listed.
The
factors are:
(1)
The relative strength, nature, quality, extent of involvement, and stability of
the child's relationship with each parent, siblings, and other significant
persons in the child's life;
(2)
Prior agreements of the parties;
(3)
Whether disrupting the contact between the child and the person with whom the
child resides a majority of the time would be more detrimental to the child
than disrupting contact between the child and the person objecting to the
relocation;
(4)
Whether either parent or a person entitled to residential time with the child
is subject to limitations under RCW 26.09.191;
(5)
The reasons of each person for seeking or opposing the relocation and the good
faith of each of the parties in requesting or opposing the relocation;
(6)
The age, developmental stage, and needs of the child, and the likely impact the
relocation or its prevention will have on the child's physical, educational,
and emotional development, taking into consideration any special needs of the
child;
(7)
The quality of life, resources, and opportunities available to the child and to
the relocating party in the current and proposed geographic locations;
(8)
The availability of alternative arrangements to foster and continue the child's
relationship with and access to the other parent;
(9)
The alternatives to relocation and whether it is feasible and desirable for the
other party to relocate also;
(10)
The financial impact and logistics of the relocation or its prevention; and
(11)
For a temporary order, the amount of time before a final decision can be made
at trial.
Relocation
cases are often amongst the toughest for families. Courts are very well aware that a
relocation of a child, especially one that is a substantial distance, will
change the relationship of the parents with the child forever. Often, because
there is no middle ground (either the child moves away or stays), it is very
difficult to settle child relocation cases, and a trial is had.
Ever
since the inception of the Relocation Act, our firm has litigated child
relocation cases with a tremendous amount of success for clients, both seeking
to relocate and for those parents opposing the relocation of their
children. Fully understanding the legal
requirements of this Act, is paramount when facing a relocation case.
Family law litigation, including relocation with children, can
be emotionally difficult and complex. Decisions made about each step of the
litigation can affect you for many years. We have years of experience helping
our clients through the difficulty of family law and relocation actions and can
help you through the process. Contact us today at (253) 838 – 3377 or email
at office@bainslawfirm.com, to talk about your case.
Disclaimer: All materials provided on this website have been
prepared by Bains Law Firm for general information purposes only and
no representation is made as to their completeness or accuracy. Information on
this website is not intended as legal advice, and may not be relied upon as such.
Only an attorney who can review the unique facts of each case and apply them to
the statutes, case law and court rules can provide legal advice. Nothing in
this website shall be construed to create an attorney-client
relationship.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.